Side by Side: Russell Hobbs Desire Slice & Go vs. Sensiohome Slica

We usually use our Magimix food processor for slicing and grating but it has a large footprint, and takes up valuable space on our worktop… And as it’s pretty heavy, it’s not hugely practical to put it away and get it back out each time we need it. Even though it’s a great appliance, I’m starting to resent the space it takes up more and more, and thinking about alternatives.

russell hobbs desire slice and go sensiohome slica
Russell Hobbs Desire Slice & Go; Sensiohome Slica

When I first saw these much smaller food slicers, I thought one of them might be a good option. They are a fair bit smaller than our food processor, so could be left out all the time, but they’re also light enough that it should be easy to grab them from the cupboard as and when needed. Of course, the functionality is reduced – we use our food processor to puree, blend and mix wet batters – but we have a very good blender that can do those tasks just as easily.

I was offered the opportunity to review two models by well known brands. We did some side-by-side testing to put both models through their paces.

As you can see, the Russell Hobbs Desire Slice & Go has a smaller footprint, which is great for households with limited space. The Sensiohome Slica is a little larger, but exactly the same height.

Spicy-Paprika-Coleslaw-Condensed-Milk-Cider-Vinegar-5332

The Russell Hobbs Desire Slice & Go comes with three attachments – slicing, shredding and grating.
The Sensiohome Slica comes with five attachments – fine slicing, coarse slicing, fine shredding, coarse shredding and grating.

The Desire Slice & Go has specially provided slots on the back in which to store the two attachments that are not currently in use.
The Sensiohome Slica doesn’t have any such storage for the four attachments not in use.

We found the Desire Slice & Go attachments very simple to change – they are held in place with the red screw-on cap.
In contrast, the Sensiohome Slica attachments were a real struggle to change, particularly to remove after use.

Spicy-Paprika-Coleslaw-Condensed-Milk-Cider-Vinegar-5334 Spicy-Paprika-Coleslaw-Condensed-Milk-Cider-Vinegar-5336

The feeding funnels are similar in size – the Russell Hobbs Desire Slice & Go one is marginally smaller, requiring food to be cut into slightly smaller pieces before feeding through.

Spicy-Paprika-Coleslaw-Condensed-Milk-Cider-Vinegar-5345 Spicy-Paprika-Coleslaw-Condensed-Milk-Cider-Vinegar-5348 Spicy-Paprika-Coleslaw-Condensed-Milk-Cider-Vinegar-5351 Spicy-Paprika-Coleslaw-Condensed-Milk-Cider-Vinegar-5353
Spicy-Paprika-Coleslaw-Condensed-Milk-Cider-Vinegar-5357 Spicy-Paprika-Coleslaw-Condensed-Milk-Cider-Vinegar-5361 Spicy-Paprika-Coleslaw-Condensed-Milk-Cider-Vinegar-5363 Spicy-Paprika-Coleslaw-Condensed-Milk-Cider-Vinegar-5365

We found that the Sensiohome Slica had more of a tendency to fling the extruded vegetables to the side, thus completely escaping the bowl we’d placed beneath it. A wider plate would help with this.
The Russell Hobbs Desire Slice & Go also did this, but to a much lesser extent.

By virtue of its additional attachments, the Sensiohome Slica allowed us to grate red cabbage, white cabbage and carrot more finely.
However, the Russell Hobbs Desire Slice & Go attachments grated the vegetables sufficiently finely for our purposes.

Although the motors are both rated at 150 watts, the Russell Hobbs Desire Slice & Go was significantly faster and more powerful, and the vegetables fed through without pressure, very quickly.
We found ourselves having to push vegetables down with the feeder insert and force them against and through the cutting blades.

After use, we found the Russell Hobbs Desire Slice & Go much easier to disassemble and clean.
The Sensiohome proved tricky to disassemble and clean, partly because pieces of food became stuck between blade and tube during use.

Both models offer a continuous power and a pulse option. We used continuous power for our testing.

Spicy-Paprika-Coleslaw-Condensed-Milk-Cider-Vinegar-5376

We did a further experiment with a block of cheddar.

The Sensiohome Slica was completely unable to process the cheddar at all – the cheese gummed up the grater attachment and tube within seconds. We suspect this is because the attachment cutting edges aren’t sharp enough. We tried to push the cheese down against them using the tube feeder, but it didn’t help and we gave up and grated the cheese by hand.
The Russell Hobbs Desire Slice & Go handled the block of cheddar without any problems at all. I don’t know whether the blades are sharper, or whether Russell Hobbs have simply harnessed more power from the motor (both are 150 watts), but whatever the reason, the results were drastically different.

 

CONCLUSION

When it comes to pricing, both appliances are available for approximately the same price, if you shop around.

Amazon is currently offering the Russell Hobbs Desire Slice & Go for £29.88.
The Amazon price for the Sensiohome Slica is £44.53 however, you can find it for £25.89 at Argos or £24.99 on The A Range.

Clearly, Russell Hobbs Desire Slice & Go is ahead on virtually all counts – it has a smaller footprint, is faster and more effortless to use, the attachments are easier to insert and remove and it is easier to clean after use. It is also better able to handle dense or sticky ingredients such as cheese.
The Sensiohome Slica offers more granularity of grating or shredding size, and a very slightly wider feed tube but is difficult to assemble, disassemble and clean, lacks power in use and fails on key tests such as grating cheese.

 

Kavey Eats received product samples of both appliances, courtesy of Russell Hobbs and Sensiohome (MPL Group).

Please leave a comment - I love hearing from you!
5 Comments to "Side by Side: Russell Hobbs Desire Slice & Go vs. Sensiohome Slica"

  1. Catherine

    Hmmmm can’t say after reading that review I will be rushing out to buy one, but your coleslaw looks delicious.

    Reply
  2. June

    Thanks, I was trying to decide which model to buy, and after reading your report have decided on the Kenwood. It definitely looks the better of the two.

    Reply
    kaveyeats

    Neither of the two I reviewed are Kenwood make, one is by Russell Hobbs and the other by Sensiohome.

    Reply
  3. June

    Oops, I’m so sorry, I don’t know why I typed Kenwood? I think I must have been falling asleep because I’d not even looked at that make?
    Thanks again for the review, it was really helpful and answered all my questions on the machines, I’m on my way to the shop to buy a Russell Hobbs!! :))

    Reply

Please leave a comment - I love hearing from you!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *